
Understanding Moral Obligation by Robert Stern
In many histories of modern ethics, Kant is supposed to have ushered in an anti-realist or constructivist turn by holding that unless we ourselves 'author' or lay down moral norms and values for ourselves, our autonomy as agents will be threatened. In this book, Robert Stern challenges the cogency of this 'argument from autonomy', and claims that Kant never subscribed to it. Rather, it is not value realism but the apparent obligatoriness of morality that really poses a challenge to our autonomy: how can this be accounted for without taking away our freedom? The debate the book focuses on therefore concerns whether this obligatoriness should be located in ourselves (Kant), in others (Hegel) or in God (Kierkegaard). Stern traces the historical dialectic that drove the development of these respective theories, and clearly and sympathetically considers their merits and disadvantages; he concludes by arguing that the choice between them remains open.-
The Idea of a Critical Theory
-
Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy
-
Political Theory and Postmodernism
-
The Mask of Enlightenment
-
Hegel's Social Philosophy
-
Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory
-
Kant's Theory of Virtue
-
Brentano and Intrinsic Value
-
Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference
-
Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem
-
Adorno
-
Kant's Theory of Taste
-
Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment
-
Saussure
- Schopenhauer's Politics
-
Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism
-
Philosophy and Temporality from Kant to Critical Theory
-
Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism
-
Kierkegaard on Faith and Love
-
Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy
-
Music, Philosophy, and Modernity
-
Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God
-
Heidegger's Analytic
-
Foucault on Freedom
-
Judgement and Sense in Modern French Philosophy
-
Nietzsche on Conflict, Struggle and War
-
Meinong and the Principle of Independence
-
Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought
-
Husserl and the Promise of Time
-
Heidegger's Concept of Truth
-
Kant on Beauty and Biology
-
Fichte's Social and Political Philosophy
-
Heidegger's Social Ontology
-
Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion
-
Kant's Defense of Common Moral Experience
-
Kant and the Fate of Autonomy
-
Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception
-
The Persistence of Romanticism
-
Nietzsche's Dangerous Game
-
Comte after Positivism
'In his thoroughly researched and tightly argued new book, Robert Stern proposes that the 'standard story' of Kant as an ethical constructivist - in particular, the idea that Kant rejected value realism as a threat to autonomy - is seriously misleading Stern's book is a model of how systematic philosophy can be fruitfully pursued in dialogue with historical sources without doing violence to the historical particularity of those sources' Philosophy in Review
Robert Stern is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield. He is the author of Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object (1990), Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification (2000), Hegel and the 'Phenomenology of Spirit' (2002) and Hegelian Metaphysics (2009). He is editor of Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects (1999) and G. W. F. Hegel: Critical Assessments (1993).
| SKU | Unavailable |
| ISBN 13 | 9781107012073 |
| ISBN 10 | 1107012074 |
| Title | Understanding Moral Obligation |
| Author | Robert Stern |
| Series | Modern European Philosophy |
| Condition | Unavailable |
| Binding Type | Hardback |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Year published | 2011-12-15 |
| Number of pages | 292 |
| Cover note | Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary. |
| Note | Unavailable |























































