Mates claims to offer a case study which gives a new perspective on the nature and significance of the turmoil in Edwardian Britain. It is a claim that is well justified. Like every good case study, it demonstrates the complexity of events and the role of the personal and the idiosyncratic. But it also demonstrates convincingly the intertwining of the political and the industrial struggles in the early years of the twentieth century, with the consequences that are with us still.
Quentin Outram, University of Leeds, Labour History Review, vol. 81 No. 2 July 2016
This is a painstakingly thorough account.
Don Watson, North East History no. 47 2016
There is no other work on this topic of this quality and this will join the spine of books which constitute the definitive accounts in regional and national mining historiography.
Stuart Howard, Social History, 42:1 (2017), pp. 121123
the language used is never obscure, this is [] a very rigorous academic study.
Activists need to draw on material and approaches from studies like this book, presenting them primarily as examples of how historians pose and seek to clarify problems. We need to do this without crudifying the reasoning processes of the historians involved, but to do it, at the same time, in such a way as so far as possible to convince activists who are not academically trained that they too can think historically.
Colin Waugh, Post-16 Educator, 86 (January, 2017), pp. 2021
The book displays an impressive grasp of sources and the text is exhaustively annotated. Mates mines the extant minutes of the DMA and its lodges (branches) and makes use of the extensive local newspaper coverage of the coal industry.
John Tomaney, The London School of Economics and Political Science
'Mates has produced an important and valuable contribution to the historiography of both the Great Labour Unrest and the rise of Labour. Furthermore, his exceptionally detailed and convincingly argued case study highlights the crucial importance of understanding local conditions and circumstances if we are to fully understand national changes'.
David Selway, Sussex University, Twentieth Century British History
A wonderful work of scholarship that employs a formidable wealth of hitherto barely utilized primary evidence to evaluate even-handedly the objective and subjective constraints and opportunities at work.
It makes an important distinct contribution.
Ralph Darlington, University of Salford, Economic History Review, 70, 1 (2017), pp. 342343
Naturally, the centenary of the [Great Labour] unrest brought renewed interest in the phenomenon, though not as much as one would expect in a country that once led the world in labour studies, guided by the twin towers of E. P. Thompson and Eric Hobsbawm. For that reason, among others, Lewis Matess monograph is especially welcome.
Mates avoids the partisan, special pleading that has characterized much of the literature arguing for syndicalist influence on contemporary British workers and adopts a more complex and multi-faceted approach
it is written clearly, researched thoroughly, objective and judicious in interpretation. It makes a substantial contribution to the debate on the Great Labour Unrest and will be of immense interest to students of the topic.
Emmet OConnor, Ulster University, History, 102:350 (April 2017), pp. 326327
This meticulously researched and carefully crafted book makes a significant contribution to the literature on the prospects for Edwardian Liberalism and for Labour as an independent force.
David Howell, University of York, EHR, February 2018
Going down the pit of Lewis Mates Great Labour Unrest and exploring its nooks and crannies is a demanding but stimulating experience you will not regret.
Yann Beliard, Universite Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, Anarchist Studies 27.1
-- .
