'This book reminds us of conversations we're not having about online life - with family, friends, with our political representatives - because we don't know where to start. The Internet seems so opaque, that we don't know to get traction on our concern that it no longer serves our human needs. This welcome volume suggests entry points for designers and users - to start those necessary conversations about how to make online life serve our emotional and social purposes. Both scholarly and down-to-earth, filled with compelling examples, it is a textbook for classrooms, dinnertables, and policy discussions.' Sherry Turkle, MIT, Author of The Empathy Diaries, Reclaiming Conversation, Alone Together, and Life on the Screen
'Should you believe Wikipedia? is an extremely useful book about the positive aspects of life online: supportive online communities, social construction of knowledge, online collaboration, the ways online communities can create and harvest social capital, how to safely and productively use Wikipedia, and more. With so much news and speculation about what is wrong about life online, this book from an OG participant and academic expert is a welcome and well-documented argument for all the good things life online can do. I would give it to every high school graduate.' Howard Rheingold, Author of Net Smart and The Virtual Community
'Simply brilliant! Bruckman brings together abstract, sociological and psychological perspectives to articulate a science of online community design. Should You Believe Wikipedia? combines practical skills and theoretical understanding to implement and evaluate the social platforms of the future. This work sets the bar for what students of human-computer interaction need to understand and do to address the societal challenges brought by the ubiquity of online interactions.' Keith N. Hampton, Department of Media and Information, Michigan State University
'From its birth, Amy Bruckman has understood and explained the Net. This book, both practical and theoretical, offers the most mature account that we have of how community online gets made and corrupted. At a moment when the hope of the Internet has faded for so many, this clear and powerful work gives us at least a path back, and a reason to pursue it.' Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School
