Excellent and devastating new book. . . . Provides a real education on media fraud, which is infinitely more important than media bias. * The Atlanta Journal-Constitution *
This title offers tools to assist in understanding what and how media reports. * Ann Arbor News *
Risk and uncertainty plague our daily lives, especially when they drive media headlines. But savvy consumers of news have a new ally with the appearance of this timely and entertaining read that manages to take the process apart and show us the guts of how news is really made. -- John D. Graham, director, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis
David Murray, Joel Schwartz, and Robert Lichter look beneath the surface of today's journalism and find narrative 'templates' that reflect journalists' ideologies and world views-which are often very different from that of readers, listeners, and viewers. In It Ain't Necessarily So, they show how this results in sloppy reporting, misleading impressions, and the propagation of downright lies. This book helps consumers of journalism make sense of the news-even when the journalists have made nonsense of the statistics. -- Michael Barone, senior writer, U.S. News & World Report; co-author, The Almanac of American Politics
One of the greatest dangers to good public policy is bad reporting on science. It abounds. In this important new book, the authors explore why the media has such a tough time getting the story straight on scientific research. Better yet, they expertly demystify the process, showing consumers why they often get an adulterated media product with little relationship to reality. -- James K. Glassman, American Enterprise Institute
Fake statistics flood the news media these days. This book is the essential antidote. -- John Leo, U.S. News & World Reports
Today agenda-driven social pressures can cloud the media's presentation of the complex enterprise of science. With splendid insight, Murray et al. clear the biases in a powerful and timely primer that leaps the chasm of ignorance to show the facts of science. -- Sallie Baliunas, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Readers from all walks of life will acquire a more critical eye from this thought-provoking examination of how science gets served up for our early-morning reading and postprandial evening news. * Publishers Weekly *
Recommended reading for all members of the news media audience. * Skeptical Inquirer *
The authors are respected critics of science reporting. The authors commendably ground their ideas in previous scholarship and provide helpful annotations within chapters. Highly recommended for academic journalism collections serving upper-division undergraduates through faculty and for professional and public libraries. * CHOICE *
The authors do a fine, well-researched job in shining a light on the problems of the reader should beware. * The Philadelphia Inquirer *
An impressive piece of media criticism, more serious-minded and rigorous than sloppy and alarmist reporting on science deserves, and surprisingly readable. * The Weekly Standard *
The book offers a solid critique of the way data-based reports and studies are presented in the media. * Idaho Statesman *
It Ain't Necessarily So details how many of the 'facts' that drive sensational claims derive from how numbers are defined. * Wall Street Journal Asia *
The authors' analysis of what kinds of misreports were made is solid, and their understanding of the pressures on reporters is profound. * The Maui News *
I recommend that everyone take time to read this book. -- Joseph Endres, The Endres Group * Inform *
Riveting! * Philanthropy *
The commentaries on stories are measured and convincing. * Times Literary Supplement *
Well-written and carefully researched . . . a valuable addition to earlier studies of media and science. * Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly *
