Anyone working in the analytical tradition of philosophy of religion, at any level, would find something of interest in the book: both as teaching material (I know from experience how much students enjoy some of the experiments), and as a contribution in its own right. * Philosophy *
Mawson addresses his imagined reader in a witty and intimate style, regaling us with hilarious anecdotes - featuring butlers, straight bananas, space-ships and complaints about the government - which do double-service as philosophically probing thought experiments...the great virtue of the book is that is does not simply introduce students to the main lines of argument and critique (although that it does), but it encourages the reader to think, by showing how a philosopher might approach an issue, with an interest not so much in the literature about it, but in the questions of truth that the literature is about. Also admirable is the way in which Mawson advances an original position, so making it of wider interest to the more advanced reader. * Christopher Insole, Philosophy *
a lively and engaging introduction to the philosophy of religion...makes some significant contributions to contemporary debates in the subject, and which will provide a great deal of discussion among those working in this field ... his style is contagiously enthusiastic ... Mawson has presented a provocative and stimulating argument concerning the nature and existence of God * Brian Clack, Ars Disputandi *
The conversational and relaxed style, as of a good _ undergraduate supervision, full of lively illustrations in_ the form of little parables, appeals. But the discussion _ moves to a higher level than the commendation suggests, and T.J. Mawson voices interesting and provocative thoughts. * TLS *
