

Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review by Neil Levy
Peer review is supposed to ensure that published work, in philosophy and in other disciplines, meets high standards of rigor and interest. But many people fear that it no longer is fit to play this role. This Element examines some of their concerns. It uses evidence that critics of peer review sometimes cite to show its failures, as well as empirical literature on the reception of bullshit, to advance positive claims about how the assessment of scholarly work is appropriately influenced by features of the context in which it appears: for example, by readers' knowledge of authorship or of publication venue. Reader attitude makes an appropriate and sometimes decisive difference to perceptions of argument quality. This Element finishes by considering the difference that author attitudes to their own arguments can appropriately make to their reception. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.| SKU | Unavailable |
| ISBN 13 | |
| ISBN 10 | |
| Title | Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review |
| Author | Neil Levy |
| Series | |
| Condition | Unavailable |
| Binding Type | |
| Publisher | |
| Year published | |
| Number of pages | |
| Cover note | Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary. |
| Note | Unavailable |
View All Editions
Filter
Applied Filters (0)
Sort by:
Loading editions...