
Evidentialism at 40 by Kevin Mccain
This volume presents state-of-the-art research on issues related to evidentialism. It demonstrates the continuing relevance of evidentialist epistemology by bringing it into direct confrontation with some of its latest non-evidentialist rivals and by proposing new areas for exploration and development.
Conee and Feldman’s landmark paper “Evidentialism” (1985) served as a launching point for an enormous research program in epistemology. Many epistemologists define their points of view at least partly in terms of how they relate to evidentialism. The chapters in this volume address important questions related to evidentialism, including:
- How should ‘evidentialism’ be defined?
- When does evidence suffice for belief?
- What does properly or appropriately responding to one’s evidence involve?
- Does evidentialism capture all cases of epistemically justified believing?
- Is there any kind of epistemic normativity that falls outside the purview of evidentialist epistemology?
- Are core evidentialist theses compatible with certain forms of externalism?
- Do classical evidentialist theses successfully preclude pragmatism?
- Do moral considerations ever get a say in what it is rational to believe?
- What (more) should evidentialists say about suspending judgment?
- What is the connection between evidence and logical inference?
- What should evidentialists say about extended memory?
- Does public evidence matter to epistemic justification?
The range of fresh ideas in this cutting-edge volume, marking the 40th anniversary of “Evidentialism”, will appeal to scholars and graduate students working on evidentialism, evidence, the nature of justification, evidential support, and related topics in epistemology.
-
The Philosophy of Indoctrination
- Bursting Our Epistemic Bubbles
-
Suspension in Epistemology and Beyond
-
Knowledge and Rationality
-
Misinformation, Content Moderation, and Epistemology
-
The Epistemic Injustice of Genocide Denialism
-
Responsibility for Rationality
-
How Should We Rationally Deal with Ignorance?
-
Epistemic Systems in Action
-
New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism
-
Trust Responsibly
-
Rational Understanding
-
Seemings and the Foundations of Justification
-
Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered
-
Illuminating Errors
-
Epistemic Instrumentalism Explained
-
The Dispositional Architecture of Epistemic Reasons
-
Ethno-Epistemology
-
Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology
-
Higher-Order Evidence and Moral Epistemology
-
Intellectual Dependability
-
Knowing and Checking
-
Epistemic Dilemmas and Epistemic Normativity
-
New Perspectives on Epistemic Closure
-
Rationality in Context
-
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
-
Seemings
-
Propositional and Doxastic Justification
-
The Social Epistemology of Legal Trials
-
Knowledge and Rational Action
-
Inquiry
-
The Epistemology of Experts
-
Digital Knowledge
-
The Philosophy of Group Polarization
-
The Ethics of Belief and Beyond
Kevin McCain is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. He has authored and edited several works in epistemology and philosophy of science.
Scott Stapleford is Professor of Philosophy at St. Thomas University in Fredericton, Canada. He has authored and edited several works in epistemology and Early Modern philosophy.
Matthias Steup is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has edited several books and authored many articles in epistemology.
| SKU | Unavailable |
| ISBN 13 | 9781032737041 |
| ISBN 10 | 1032737042 |
| Title | Evidentialism at 40 |
| Author | Kevin Mccain |
| Series | Routledge Studies In Epistemology |
| Condition | Unavailable |
| Binding Type | Hardback |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Year published | 2025-08-08 |
| Number of pages | 356 |
| Cover note | Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary. |
| Note | Unavailable |

































