Rethinking the New Deal Court by Barry Cushman

Rethinking the New Deal Court by Barry Cushman

Regular price
Checking stock...
Regular price
Checking stock...
Summary

Rejecting as inadequate conventional attempts to understand the "constitutional Revolution of 1937" as a political response to political pressuresin the US, Cushman's account treats the events of the 1930s as a chapter in the history of ideas rather than as merely an episode in the history of American politics.

The feel-good place to buy books
  • Free US shipping over $15
  • Buying preloved emits 41% less CO2 than new
  • Millions of affordable books
  • Give your books a new home - sell them back to us!

Rethinking the New Deal Court by Barry Cushman

Rejecting as inadequate conventional attempts to understand the constitutional Revolution of 1937 as a political response to political pressuresin the US, Cushman's account treats the events of the 1930s as a chapter in the history of ideas rather than as merely an episode in the history of American politics.
"A meticulous craftsman, Cushman builds a convincing case for his revisionist thesisHis book is a smooth blend of intellectual and political history; he is equally at home with the nuances of legal doctrine on the Court and the political battles going on outside it. He brings out of the large unruly mass of constitutional cases decided between 1870 and 1937 a strong, clear story, powerful in its simplicity and very persuasive. After this book no one will be able to talk about the 'Constitutional Revolution of the New Deal' in quite the same way again."--Robert W. Gordon, Yale Law School "It is not often that a book comes along that provides a whole new way of thinking about a familiar subject. But Barry Cushman has written a convincing, revolutionary reinterpretation of the conventional wisdom about the so-called 'Constitutional Revolution of 1937' and its notorious 'switch in time'. In the process, Cushman provides us with a compelling and powerful counter-argument about the true origins and dimensions of constitutional and historical change in the New Deal period."--Alfred S. Konefsky, SUNY at Buffalo Law School "Cushman makes a strong case for weighing intellectual developments on the Court." aw and History Reviews (Spring 2002) "...thoroughly researched, carefully reasoned, and clearly argued presentation."--Historian "A meticulous craftsman, Cushman builds a convincing case for his revisionist thesis. His book is a smooth blend of intellectual and political history; he is equally at home with the nuances of legal doctrine on the Court and the political battles going on outside it. He brings out of the large unruly mass of constitutional cases decided between 1870 and 1937 a strong, clear story, powerful in its simplicity and very persuasive. After this book no one will be able to talk about the 'Constitutional Revolution of the New Deal' in quite the same way again."--Robert W. Gordon, Yale Law School "It is not often that a book comes along that provides a whole new way of thinking about a familiar subject. But Barry Cushman has written a convincing, revolutionary reinterpretation of the conventional wisdom about the so-called 'Constitutional Revolution of 1937' and its notorious 'switch in time'. In the process, Cushman provides us with a compelling and powerful counter-argument about the true origins and dimensions of constitutional and historical change in the New Deal period."--Alfred S. Konefsky, SUNY at Buffalo Law School "Rejecting as simplistic and incomplete the now familiar political switch-in-time explanations of the Court's decisions upholdingkey New Deal legislation, Cushman offers an account of those 1937 cases that sees them as logical as well as intellectually and legally honest outcomes of somewhat earlier developments in constitutional doctrine...This is a well-crafted book; it offers a compelling story." --Law and Politics Book Review "Professor Cushman has written a brilliant, provocative account that contributes a much-needed broadened interpretive perspective to the constitutional history of the New Deal era."--The Journal of American History "Rejects the standard interpretation of the New Deal as a revolution in constitutional law necessitated by conservative judicial opposition to modern liberalism...Cushman bases his account on case fact situations, the arguments of counsel, the opinions of judges, and private correspondence...Eliminating a standard explanation of it, he raises the question of what Roosevelt administration was really trying to do, constitutionally speaking." The Journal of Southwestern History
SKU Unavailable
ISBN 13 9780195120431
ISBN 10 0195120434
Title Rethinking the New Deal Court
Author Barry Cushman
Condition Unavailable
Binding Type Paperback
Publisher Oxford University Press Inc
Year published 1999-03-04
Number of pages 336
Cover note Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary.